New Saudi Scandal: Promoting Israeli Mossad Platforms Against Palestinian Resistance

In a major scandal, the Saudi regime has been marketing Israeli Mossad platforms to incite against the Palestinian resistance and sow discord among the Palestinian public. This campaign has been ongoing for months and continues unabated.

According to special sources, numerous video clips promoted by Saudi media, especially the state-funded Al Arabiya channel, originate from media platforms affiliated with the Israeli Mossad. One such platform is “Yaffa Platform,” which disseminates selectively edited videos of Gaza residents and fabricates other clips with the explicit aim of inciting against the Palestinian resistance and the October 7th attack.

Since the beginning of the war of annihilation in Gaza, the Saudi royal court has launched a systematic campaign against the Palestinian resistance. This campaign includes relentless warfare and dishonorable hostility, starting with defamation and ending with excommunication.

Observers have noted that with the onset of the Battle of Al-Aqsa Flood on October 7, the Saudi royal court chose to side against Gaza and its resistance. It directed its media to launch intensive attacks aimed at demonizing and discrediting the resistance.

These ferocious attacks, however, have not harmed the resistance, which is respected by freedom lovers in our nation and around the world. Instead, they have tarnished the image of Saudi Arabia, making it look hostile to the resistance and adversarial to the broader Muslim world.

The intensity and malice of these attacks have increased alongside the resistance’s successes and growing international support.

One of the key tactics used by the royal court’s media and nationalist forces in their dirty war against Gaza and its resistance is accusing the resistance of terrorism, claiming that their October 7 attacks to liberate settlements occupied by Israeli settlers were barbaric and an act of aggression.

The media also falsely accused the resistance of killing a German tourist and mutilating her body after raping her, a story initially fabricated by Israeli sites at the start of the events. In reality, the woman held an Israeli passport, and she was neither killed nor harmed, highlighting the intent to tarnish the resistance’s image globally.

A new campaign by the Saudi media accused the resistance of hiding among civilians and adopted the Israeli narrative on this matter. However, subsequent footage of hospital raids refuted these claims, showing that civilian buildings were free of resistance fighters and their weapons.

As the resistance achieved military successes from October 7 and through the ground battles on Gaza’s borders, the Saudi media adopted Israeli narratives to downplay and marginalize the resistance’s victories, denying their military achievements and the impact on the Israeli army.

With the residents of Gaza rallying around the resistance and its fighters, the media resorted to further lies and fabrications, spreading a false clip showing resistance fighters treating Gaza residents harshly and beating them. Investigations later revealed that the clip actually depicted Palestinian Authority personnel interacting with residents of the West Bank.

The media accused the resistance of aligning with Iran and its proxies, even though the resistance benefited from Iran’s military technology when Arab nations failed to support them. Meanwhile, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman reconciled with Iran, complied with the demands of the Houthi arm, paid salaries to its militia members, and re-engaged with Assad, Iran’s ally in Syria, through normalization.

After failing to undermine the resistance, and with the repeated appearances of Abu Ubaida and his wide influence on the media and the younger generation, the media launched a smear campaign against him personally, attempting to strip him of his masculinity and courage, dubbing him “the veiled one” after he became an Arab and Islamic icon.

The media’s war even extended to Abu Ubaida’s “keffiyeh” (traditional Arab headscarf), attacking it by claiming he was trying to impersonate the authentic Arab keffiyeh to rally people around him, which only served to highlight the media’s idiocy and shallow thinking, causing more harm than good to the royal court.

In a related context, Saudi opposition sources have revealed that there is an ongoing Saudi campaign, the most dangerous yet, against the Palestinian resistance amid Israel’s brutal war on Gaza.

According to opposition sources, in coordination with Israel, a number of royal court media operatives, known as the “Moderation Center,” were tasked with creating social media accounts impersonating Gaza residents. The goal was to attack the Palestinian resistance, blaming it for the bombing, destruction, and killings committed by Israel, in addition to a long list of accusations against resistance movements and their leaders.

Previously, an investigation had exposed Saudi accounts inciting against the Palestinian resistance and criticizing the military operation by the Al-Qassam Brigades against Israel as part of the “Al-Aqsa Flood” operation.

The intelligence platform “Eikad” reported that Saudi accounts appeared simultaneously with the start of the “Al-Aqsa Flood” operation, attacking the Palestinian resistance.

The investigation found that these accounts had identical narratives, repeating the same sentences and phrases intensely just hours after the operation began.

These accounts focused on spreading claims that the resistance targeted Israeli civilians, treated them brutally, and took them hostage, attaching their posts with misleading images and stories about women.

The same accounts also alleged that the conflict was merely a staged act between the resistance and Israel, with the primary goal of raising funds and gaining support, and reiterated that religious law prohibits the resistance’s war as it causes harm to the country and its people.

Saudi accounts also promoted the notion of an Iranian role in the resistance’s operation to prevent the completion of a peace deal and claimed that Iran initiated the war to obstruct a defensive agreement with the United States, which was to be concluded if the normalization efforts between Saudi Arabia and Iran succeeded.

By analyzing the accounts that repeated the same phrases and promoted an anti-resistance narrative, it was evident that they were coordinated electronic committees, systematically interacting with central Saudi accounts and repeating the same rhetoric.

These accounts were found to be part of a single committee due to the similar creation dates of many of them (most were created in October, September, and August), and they interacted with the same accounts, promoting the same narratives.

These committees amplified the interaction with content from known Israeli accounts, such as the official Israel account or “Nili Cohen,” who works within Israeli committees in Morocco.

The same committees promoted anti-Islam rhetoric, portraying it as a violent religion and linking it to the resistance’s motivations. Strangely, they frequently interacted with pornographic content on Twitter.

The analysis revealed that these accounts interacted with several central accounts, such as “Sam Yusuf” and “Karim Jahin” (who were previously linked to Israeli committees in a prior investigation), or other suspicious central accounts like “Kaam” and “Thomas”:

The “Kaam” account is a fake account promoting racial discrimination and attacking all other Arab countries, describing their peoples as non-Arab, and is one of the central accounts here.

The analysis of “Kaam” led to its TikTok account, which identifies as a female, reposting responses written in Hebrew from accounts claiming to be Saudi, though this isn’t the strangest aspect of the account.

The strange part is that the analysis showed its link to several fake accounts, each entirely different from the other. The “Kaam” account is linked to another TikTok account with a Yemeni identity, now presenting as Saudi.

It is also linked to another YouTube account with a Moroccan identity that attacks Arabs, claiming to be Amazigh. The YouTube account’s narrative follows the same pattern used by “Kaam” on Twitter.

These findings confirm that “Kaam,” one of the central accounts in this Saudi-Zionist committee, is a fake account promoting racism and supporting the Zionist narrative. Another central account, equally as strange as “Kaam,” is the “Thomas” account.

The analysis of the “Thomas” account is somewhat odd. The account tweeted from the United States in April and May, then changed its location to Kuwait, interfering in internal Kuwaiti affairs and stirring trouble, and currently tweets about Saudi affairs as if it were a Saudi citizen.

The “Thomas” account is clearly linked to Israeli committees, repeatedly posting the same content as “Sam Yusuf” and “Karim Jahin,” as well as the “Kaam” account, indicating the copying and spreading of messages within that committee.

The investigation concluded that these accounts attacking the Palestinian resistance and promoting anti-resistance narratives are in fact systematically coordinated Saudi-Israeli committees, amplifying interactions on several tweets.

Observers agree that since the start of the “Al-Aqsa Flood” operation, the Saudi regime has collapsed dramatically on all fronts—media, popular, political, and moral—having chosen a relentless war against Gaza and a disgraceful alignment with the occupation.