Over 100 BBC Employees Accuse the Corporation of Bias in Favor of Occupation

More than 230 media professionals have signed a letter sent to the Director-General of the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), Tim Davie, accusing over 100 BBC staff members of biased coverage favoring the Israeli occupation and calling for a “recommitment to fairness, accuracy, and impartiality” in its reporting on Gaza.

In a letter sent to Tim Davie and signed by more than 230 media workers, including 101 anonymous BBC staff, the signatories criticized the corporation for failing to adhere to its own editorial standards by consistently lacking “journalism based on fair and accurate evidence” in its Gaza coverage.

According to the British newspaper The Independent, which exclusively obtained the letter, it is also signed by figures such as Sayeeda Warsi and actress Juliet Stevenson. They urge the BBC to report “without fear or favor” and “adhere to the highest editorial standards, focusing on fairness, accuracy, and the required impartiality.”

The letter demands that the BBC implement a series of editorial commitments, such as “ensuring that Israel does not allow foreign journalists into Gaza; clarifying when there is insufficient evidence to support Israeli claims; stating Israel as the aggressor in headlines when necessary; and regularly including historical context before October 2023; and strongly challenging Israeli government and military representatives in all interviews.”

The BBC has denied these allegations, affirming its “commitment to rising to its responsibility to deliver reliable and neutral news.”

A BBC spokesperson said, “When we make mistakes or change our coverage approach, we are transparent. We are also very clear with our audience about the limitations on our coverage, including the inability to access Gaza and restricted areas in Lebanon, and we continue to strive to send our reporters to those regions.”

Signatories of the letter include historian William Dalrymple, Dr. Catherine Haber, a prominent sociology lecturer and media director at the University of Glasgow, and Rizwana Hameed, director of a media monitoring center, and broadcaster John Nicholson.

This is not the first time the BBC has been criticized for bias during the war on Gaza. Last September, the BBC denied allegations of breaching its guidelines over 1500 times after a controversial report claimed some of its reporters had justified or downplayed Hamas’s activities. A BBC spokesperson at the time said the research would be “carefully considered” but denied claims of bias.

However, signatories insist on the bias favoring the Israeli occupation. One current employee, who signed the letter, told The Independent that some colleagues had left the corporation due to its coverage.

The employee stated, “I have never seen such low levels of trust by staff in my entire career.” They added, “I have colleagues who have left the BBC in recent months because they do not believe our reports about Israel and Palestine are truthful. Many of us feel paralyzed by the levels of fear.”

Another mentioned losing trust in the organization they work for, noting a “significant gap” in the BBC’s handling of Israel. They added, “I genuinely care about the future of the BBC, and every day I see that we are losing the audience’s trust worldwide. People are looking elsewhere to find out the truth because we simply do not deliver it to them.”

Examples provided by employees include “misleading and inhumane headlines,” such as the title given to an article about a six-year-old girl shot by the Israeli military in Gaza in January of the previous year.

More than 100 journalists have been killed while covering, and one of the signatories spoke about the headline “Hind Rajab, 6 years, found dead in Gaza after days of distress calls,” saying, “This was not a random event. The perpetrator, Israel, should have been mentioned in the headline, and it should have been clarified that she was killed.”

Another colleague said, “Palestinians are always treated as an unreliable source, and we consistently prefer presenting the Israeli narrative despite the Israeli military’s proven record of lying.”

Others pointed out that the BBC often omits Israel from headlines if possible, or casts doubt on who is responsible for airstrikes. They expect a level of verification for anything related to Gaza that exceeds what is expected in other countries.

Other employees expressed concerns about the lack of coverage, such as not broadcasting live the genocide case brought by South Africa against the Israeli occupation at the International Court of Justice on January 11th, choosing instead to broadcast live Israel’s defense the following day.

Among the 237 signatories, 72 signed publicly, including former British Foreign Secretary and broadcaster Baroness Warsi and British actress Juliet Stevenson, alongside dozens of academics.

While the letter focuses on the BBC, it also highlights shortcomings in other media outlets, including ITV and Sky.

The BBC responded by saying, “This conflict is among the most polarizing in coverage, and we recognize that people feel strongly about how it is handled, not just on the BBC but across all media. The BBC commits to high standards, striving to meet its responsibility to deliver trustworthy and neutral news, weighing and assessing the words used, fact-checking, and seeking a wide range of interviews and opinions.”

Despite acknowledging that “the BBC cannot reflect a single global view,” the spokesperson insisted that the complaints received are nearly equal regarding bias in favor of the Israeli occupation and against it.